How to solve problem on Syllogism in CAT Exam?

TO GET MORE UPDATES JOIN OUR WHATSAPP GROUP

Syllogism in CAT Exam

Syllogism is a persuasive idea of CAT. It has its function in sensible thinking and verbal capacity area also. There are roughly 3-4 inquiries dependent on it. What's more, these numerous inquiries can assume imperative function in redesigning your percentile. Hence, it's significant that you comprehend this theme well so you can score great in the test. We should initially comprehend what does syllogism mean and afterward I will disclose to you some helpful strategies that will make unraveling inquiries on this theme an easy activity for you.

Syllogism is a Greek equivalent of the word end or derivation. A more appropriate meaning of syllogism is a contention the finish of which is upheld by two suggestions, of which one contains the term that is predicate of the end, and different contains the term that is subject of the end; basic to the two premises is the term that is rejected from the end. Presently, this meaning of syllogism is by all accounts somewhat confounding at the same time, as this article continues you will individually comprehend the more profound significance of this definition. Before outlining the case of syllogism, first comprehend what is implied by suggestion? A suggestion is a sentence that says something and gives a connection between two terms. Each recommendation has three sections that shapes the sentence structure for example subject, predicate and connection between both. Think about these two suggestions:

Conclusion: All Rajasthani’s are Kind.

Let’s interpret the conclusion in terms of definition of Syllogism. Now in the sentence, All Rajasthani’s are Kind you can notice that the predicate of the proposition 2 became the predicate of conclusion (the word Kind) and the subject of the proposition 1 became the subject of conclusion (Rajasthani’s) and the common relation between the two (Indians) is missing from it. Thus, this conclusion exactly follows the definition of Syllogism. Now, you might have noticed use of word All in both the propositions. This type of proposition is called categorial propositions. The categorial proposition is further divided into two types.

  • General Proposition either completely incorporates or completely avoids the subject. Ex. All young men are tall (positive), no child is infamous (negative).
  • Specific Proposition either incompletely incorporate or prohibit the subject while offering the expression. Ex. A few oranges are sweet (positive), Some individuals are not smart (negative).
Presently the inquiries in the test will comprise of at least two suggestions that will be followed up by at least two ends and you need to answer which end follows the given recommendations, for example,

Suggestions: All tables are chalks.

All chalks are seats.
Ends: All seats are tables.
All tables are seats.
Offer response:

1. In the event that lone end 1 follows.
2. On the off chance that solitary end 2 follows.
3. In the event that either 1 or 2 follows.
4. In the event that neither 1 nor 2 follows.
5. Both 1 and 2 follows.

Presently the inquiry emerges how might we realize what of the above alternatives is right. There are two different ways to confirm what end will follow.

The Analytical Method.Let’s first fathom the Venn Diagram method. We all have come across the Venn diagram as part of set theory in our high school math’s. But those of you who are still unaware of it, Venn diagram is a pictorial representation of mathematical or logic sets using circles or closed curves. Instead of directly hoping on devising the method first learn the representation of propositions using Venn diagram. As discussed earlier, there are two types of propositions Universal and Particular which are further distinguished into the positive and negative kinds of proposition respectively. These 4 kinds can be represented through Venn Diagram. Grab a look at the table below that illustrates the distinct types of propositions and its pictorial representation using Venn diagram.

Using the above two tables we can easily form the conclusion from any number of propositions following two simple steps. Consider the example given above of tables, chairs and chalks. There are two propositions in the example:

Propositions: All tables are chalks.

All chalks are chairs.

Step 1: Draw Venn diagram of the both above propositions separately.

Now in this example, let T = tables, Chalks = CH, Chairs = CR. The first proposition says All tables are chalks. Therefore, it’s representation would be

Presently dissect the figure and investigate which ends can be drawn from it. Here just second end for example All tables are seats is right. Subsequently, the correct alternative of this inquiry is just end 2 follows. The Venn chart technique is exceptionally fascinating and simple. The above model was a fundamental one yet in test addresses will be more unpredictable and muddled. You can tackle them on similar lines as the above inquiry utilizing the two stage Venn chart technique.

We should now proceed onward the second one the diagnostic strategy. It is additionally two stages technique. First think about another arrangement of recommendations and later concoct the end.

Recommendation: Some banners are attractive.


Step 1: Aligning the given sentences.

Now by aligning it means that propositions should be written in such a way that the common term is the predicate of the first proposition and the subject of the second. In the above propositions, the common term is posters and for aligning we want that poster should be predicate of the first one. But here, it’s subject of proposition one. We will use conversion technique for that.

The rules for conversion are as follows: –

The subject becomes the predicate and the predicate becomes the subject

TO GET MORE UPDATES JOIN OUR WHATSAPP GROUP

TEAM HEADACHE